Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Nepal Academy of Science and Technology (NAST)

2 Sankharapur Polytechnic Institute, CTEVT, Nepal

3 Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Pulchowk Campus, IOE, TU, Nepal

Abstract

There are various merits of modelling the problem domain numerically, which include cost reduction, ease in variable control, enhanced yield, etc. These merits are known to everyone. This work provides a one-of-a-kind and complete evaluation of distillate yield i.e. productivity in a single slope solar still by combining computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models with experimental data. Unlike earlier research, which frequently focuses on either simulation or experimental data in isolation, this study presents a direct comparison of the two methodologies, showing their distinct strengths and limitations. The experimental model of solar still was fabricated for experimental study. Based on the experiment, distillate yield was observed every hour of the day. The experiment was conducted on the roof of Balaju School of Engineering and Technology, Kathmandu. On the other hand, CFD model was based on the practical model used for experimentation. Most of the variables were chosen as per the physical domain, such as the material of the solar still and the angle of inclination. From the comparative study, it was found that distillate yield resulted from simulation through CFD analysis, and the experiment followed a similar trend. There was an error of about 26%, which might be the result of losses that occur in practical applications that were not considered during CFD analysis. From the research, it was found that, ANSYS is a powerful tool for performing CFD analysis of practical problems involving fluid flow. Thus, it can be used for modelling and simulating more complex problem in future.

Keywords

[1]   Pakdel, M. A., Hedayatizadeh, M., Tabatabaei, S. M., & Niknia, N. (2017). An experimental study of a single-slope still with innovative side-troughs under natural circulation mode. Desalination, 422, 174-181.
[2]   Solanki, Bhumit, & Patel, J. (2017). Recent Developments in solar desalination with thermal energy storage. International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, 7, 28-36.
[3]   Hanson, Zachritz, W., Stevens, K., Mimbela, L., Polka, R., & Cisneros, L. (2004). Distillate water quality of a single basin solar still: Laboratory and field studies. Solar Energy, 76, 635-645.
[4]   Alwan, N. T., Shcheklein, S. E., & Ali, O. M. (2019). A practical study of a rectangular basin solar distillation with single slope using paraffin wax (PCM) cells. Int. J. Energy Convers., 7(4), 162-170. doi:10.15866/irecon.v7i4.17862
[5]   Zhou, S., Gong, L., Liu, X., & Shen, S. (2019). Mathematical modelling and performance analysis for multi-effect evaporation/ multi-effect evaporation with thermal vapor compression desalination system. Applied thermal engineegin, 159, 113-759. doi:10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113759
[6]   Deshmukh, H. S., & Thombre, S. B. (2017). Solar distillation with single basin solar still using sensible heat storage materials. Desalination, 410, 91-98. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2017.01.030
[7]   Ansari, S. N. (2022). Computational Fluid Dynamics Modelling and Experimental Verification to Enhance Productivity of Distillate Water in Three Dimensional Single Slope Basin Type Passive Solar Still. Pulchowk Campus, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. Lalitpur: I.O.E. Pulchowk Campus. Retrieved from https://elibrary.tucl.edu.np/items/642153c0-680d-4800-92ae-37b191301ed8
[8]   Ansys Inc. (2011). Fluent, Ansys. In Ansys Fluent Theory Guide. USA.
[9]   Ansari, S. N., Bhattarai, N., & Neupane, S. (2022). Experimental Investigation of Parameters Affecting Productivity. Proceedings of 12th IOE Graduate Conference. 12, pp. 2350-8906. IOE Graduate Conference. Retrieved October 2022, from http://conference.ioe.edu.np/publications/ioegc12/IOEGC-12-091-12132.pdf
[10] Dunkle, R. V. (1961). Solar Water Distillation: The roof type still and a multiple effect diffusion still. International Heat Transfer Conference, (p. 895). Boulder.
[11] Fluent, A. (2017). Ansys Fluent Theory Guide. USA: ANSYS Inc.