Document Type : Original Article
Authors
1 Faculty of Engineering Modern Technologies, Amol University of Special Modern Technologies (AUSMT), Amol, Iran
2 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Technical and Vocational University (TVU), Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This study examines how piston-bowl geometry influences in-cylinder flow and pollutant formation in a large diesel engine. High-fidelity simulations were performed for the baseline combustion chamber and three modified bowl designs (A, B, and C). The model replicates experimental peak pressure within 3%, soot levels with ≤1% error, and NOx emissions within ±3%. The modified bowls increase in-cylinder turbulence and induce stronger squish flows, leading to longer combustion duration but more uniform mixing. As a result, peak cylinder pressures are slightly lower in the re-designed bowls than in the baseline, and the onset of combustion is delayed. Notably, the most highly squish-inducing chamber (A) produced higher peak temperatures but also exhibited the lowest soot emissions, consistent with enhanced mixing. Across the modified chambers, indicated work and cycle efficiency increased relative to the baseline (due to reduced negative work in compression). Emissions of NOx and soot showed opposing trends: chamber A (highest turbulence) generated more NOx (owing to its higher local temperatures) but significantly less soot (owing to more complete combustion), whereas the baseline chamber had higher soot due to local fuel-rich pockets. These results indicate that combustion chamber shape can be tuned to improve mixing and efficiency, at the cost of shifting the NOx–soot trade-off. However, combustion chamber B, simultaneously improves power output by 10%, NOx emissions by 41 %, and soot emissions by 33%.
Keywords
[1] Pham, V. C., Kim, J. K., Lee, W.-J., Choe, S.-J., Le, V. V., & Choi, J.-H. (2022). Effects of piston bowl geometry on combustion and emissions of a four-stroke heavy-duty diesel marine engine. Applied Sciences, 12(24), 13012. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122413012
[2] Torregrosa, A. J., Broatch, A., Martín, J., & Monelletta, L. (2007). Combustion noise level assessment in direct injection Diesel engines by means of in-cylinder pressure components. Measurement Science and Technology, 18(7), 2131. https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-0233/18/7/045
[3] Reitz, R. D., & Rutland, C. J. (1995). Development and testing of diesel engine CFD models. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 21(2), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/0360-1285(95)00003-Z
[4] Benajes, J., Pastor, J. V., García, A., & Monsalve-Serrano, J. (2015). The potential of RCCI concept to meet EURO VI NOx limitation and ultra-low soot emissions in a heavy-duty engine over the whole engine map. Fuel, 159, 952–961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.07.064
[5] Raj, A. R. G. S., Mallikarjuna, J. M., & Ganesan, V. (2013). Energy efficient piston configuration for effective air motion—A CFD study. Applied Energy, 102, 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.07.022
[6] Abdelrazek, M. K., Abdelaal, M. M., & El-Nahas, A. M. (2022). Piston bowl shape and biodiesel fuel effects on combustion and emission of diesel engines. Journal of Engineering and Applied Science, 69, Article 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s44147-022-00158-5
[7] Li, J., Yang, W. M., An, H., Maghbouli, A., & Chou, S. K. (2014). Effects of piston bowl geometry on combustion and emission characteristics of biodiesel-fueled diesel engines. Fuel, 120, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.12.005
[8] Dent, J. C., & Derham, J. A. (1974). Air motion in a four-stroke direct injection diesel engine. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, 188(1), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1243/PIME_PROC_1974_188_030_02
[9] Miles, P. C., Rempel-Ewert, B. H., & Reitz, R. D. (2003, September). Squish-swirl and injection-swirl interaction in direct injection diesel engines. In 6th International Conference on Engines for Automobile, Proceedings, ICE2003, Capri-Naples, Italy.
[10] Gonzalez, D. M. A., Lian, Z. W., & Reitz, R. D. (1992). Modeling diesel engine spray vaporization and combustion. SAE Technical Paper 920579. https://doi.org/10.4271/920579
[11] Saito, T., Daisho, Y., Uchida, N., & Ikeya, N. (1986). Effects of combustion chamber geometry on diesel combustion. SAE Technical Paper 861186. https://doi.org/10.4271/861186
[12] Prasad, B. V. V. S. U., Sharma, C. S., Anand, T. N. C., & Ravikrishna, R. V. (2011). High swirl-inducing piston bowls in small diesel engines for emission reduction. Applied Energy, 88(7), 2355–2367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.12.068
[13] Abdul Gafoor, C. P., & Gupta, R. (2015). Numerical investigation of piston bowl geometry and swirl ratio on emission from diesel engines. Energy Conversion and Management, 101, 541–551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.06.007
[14] Yan, B., Wang, H., Zheng, Z., Qin, Y., & Yao, M. (2018). The effect of combustion chamber geometry on in-cylinder flow and combustion process in a stoichiometric operation natural gas engine with EGR. Applied Thermal Engineering, 129, 199–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.09.067
[15] Abraham, J., & Magi, V. (1998). A model for multicomponent droplet vaporization in sprays. SAE Technical Paper 980511. https://doi.org/10.4271/980511
[16] Taghavifar, H., Khalilarya, S., & Jafarmadar, S. (2014). Engine structure modifications effect on the flow behavior, combustion, and performance characteristics of DI diesel engine. Energy Conversion and Management, 85, 20–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.05.076
[17] Kidoguchi, Y., Yang, C., & Miwa, K. (1999). Effect of high squish combustion chamber on simultaneous reduction of NOx and particulate from a direct-injection diesel engine. SAE Technical Paper 1999-01-1502. https://doi.org/10.4271/1999-01-1502
[18] Doppalapudi, A. T., Azad, A. K., & Khan, M. M. K. (2021). Combustion chamber modifications to improve diesel engine performance and reduce emissions: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 152, 111683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111683
[19] Mikalsen, R., & Roskilly, A. P. (2009). A computational study of free-piston diesel engine combustion. Applied Energy, 86(7–8), 1136–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2008.08.004
[20] Rakopoulos, C. D., Kosmadakis, G. M., & Pariotis, E. G. (2010). Investigation of piston bowl geometry and speed effects in a motored HSDI diesel engine using CFD against a quasi-dimensional model. Energy Conversion and Management, 51(3), 470–484. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2009.10.010
[21] Khan, S., Panua, R., & Bose, P. K. (2018). Combined effects of piston bowl geometry and spray pattern on mixing, combustion and emissions of a diesel engine: A numerical approach. Fuel, 225, 203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.03.139
[22] Xu, L., Bai, X.-S., Li, Y., Treacy, M., Li, C., Tunestål, P., Tunér, M., & Lu, X. (2020). Effect of piston bowl geometry and compression ratio on in-cylinder combustion and engine performance in a gasoline direct-injection compression ignition engine under different injection conditions. Applied Energy, 280, 115920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115920
[23] Shojae, K., Mahdavian, M., & Baghshani, E. (2022). Investigation of piston bowl geometry, injection timing, and EGR mass fraction to improve the performance of ISM 370 diesel engine. Fuel, 324, 124422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.124422
[24] Hao, C., Zhang, Z., Wang, Z., Bai, H., Li, Y., Li, Y., & Lu, Z. (2022). Investigation of spray angle and combustion chamber geometry to improve combustion performance at full load on a heavy-duty diesel engine using genetic algorithm. Energy Conversion and Management, 267, 115862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2022.115862
[25] Hanjalić, K., Popovac, M., & Hadžiabdić, M. (2004). A robust near-wall elliptic-relaxation eddy-viscosity turbulence model for CFD. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow, 25(6), 1047–1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2004.07.005
[26] Popovac, M., & Hanjalić, K. (2007). Compound wall treatment for RANS computation of complex turbulent flows and heat transfer. Flow, Turbulence and Combustion, 78(2), 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10494-006-9067-x
[27] Costa, M., Catapano, F., Sementa, P., Sorge, U., & Vaglieco, B. M. (2016). Mixture preparation and combustion in a GDI engine under stoichiometric or lean charge: An experimental and numerical study on an optically accessible engine. Applied Energy, 180, 86–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.089
[28] Jafarmadar, S., Taghavifar, H., Taghavifar, H., & Navid, A. (2016). Numerical assessment of flow dynamics for various DI diesel engine designs considering swirl number and uniformity index. Energy Conversion and Management, 110, 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2015.12.035
[29] Liu, K., Yang, J., Jiang, W., Li, Y., Wang, Y., Feng, R., Chen, X., & Ma, K. (2016). Effect of asynchronous valve timing on combustion characteristic and performance of a high speed SI marine engine with five valves. Energy Conversion and Management, 123, 185–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.06.042
[30] Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Zhao, Z., Dong, Y., Ma, F., & Zhang, S. (2016). Study on the synthetic scavenging model validation method of opposed-piston two-stroke diesel engine. Applied Thermal Engineering, 104, 184–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.03.094
[31] Prabhu, S. S., Nayak, N. S., Kapilan, N., & Hindasageri, V. (2017). An experimental and numerical study on effects of exhaust gas temperature and flow rate on deposit formation in urea-selective catalytic reduction (SCR) system of modern automobiles. Applied Thermal Engineering, 111, 1211–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.09.134
[32] Taghavifar, H., Jafarmadar, S., Taghavifar, H., & Navid, A. (2016). Application of DoE evaluation to introduce the optimum injection strategy-chamber geometry of diesel engine using surrogate epsilon-SVR. Applied Thermal Engineering, 106, 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.05.194
[33] Ji, C., Liu, X., Wang, S., Gao, B., & Yang, J. (2014). A laminar burning velocity correlation for combustion simulation of hydrogen-enriched ethanol engines. Fuel, 133, 139–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.05.013
[34] Shi, X., Li, G., & Zhou, L. (2007). DI diesel engine combustion modeling based on ECFM-3Z model. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-4138. https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-4138
[35] Mobasheri, R. (2015). Analysis the ECFM-3Z combustion model for simulating the combustion process and emission characteristics in a HSDI diesel engine. International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics, 7(4), 353–371. https://doi.org/10.1260/1756-8277.7.4.353
[36] Mittal, G., Subhash, M., & Gwalwanshi, M. (2021). Effect of initial turbulence on combustion with ECFM-3Z model in a CI engine. Materials Today: Proceedings, 46, 11007–11010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.02.097
[37] Krnac, D., Manickam, B., Holand, P., Pathak, U., Scharl, V., & Sattelmayer, T. (2024). Comparison of tabulated and complex chemistry approaches for ammonia–diesel dual-fuel combustion simulation. SAE International Journal of Engines, 17(7), 945–960. https://doi.org/10.4271/03-17-07-0055
[38] Priesching, P., Ramusch, G., Ruetz, J., & Tatschl, R. (2007). 3D-CFD modeling of conventional and alternative diesel combustion and pollutant formation—A validation study. SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-1907. https://doi.org/10.4271/2007-01-1907
[39] Viscione, D., Ravaglioli, V., Mariani, V., Silvagni, G., & Bianchi, G. M. (2024). CFD methodology to capture the combustion behavior of a conventional diesel engine retrofitted to operate in gasoline compression ignition mode. Energies, 17(16), 4061. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17164061
)